Blogovi Postovi Blogeri Galerije Video
 

Dayton Agreement made Bosnia an occupied country

post objavio/la Sarajevska Princeza prije 13 godina na blogu Sarajevska Princeza

Komentari na post

 

Potpuno si u pravu. Evo jedan tekst sto je napisala djevojka koja je student Internacionalnog Prava i procitala je sve tacke Dejtonskog. Samo sam kopirao njen tekst za one koji su zainteresvani da cuju misljenje onih koji rade na tome da se ovaj sporazum proglasi NELEGALNIM.
================

Daytonski Sporazum je razlog zasto smo mi Bosanci jos uvijek okupirani, ali nisu ga Bosanci potpisivali vec Milosevic, Tudjman i Alija. To su 3 osobe ne kompletna bosanskohercegovacka Nacija.

Samo zato sto taj dokumenat postoji, dokumenat koji je kao "Biblija" Srbima i Hrvatima je ipak samo papir jer se ti isti nalaze u drzavi Bosanaca, tj. bosanskohercegovackoj drzavi Bosni i Hercegovini a drzava Bosna tj. njen BH Narod odlucuje o sebi, ne Srbija i Hrvatska.

"Sporazum o legalnoj Okupacije Bosne i Hercegovine" aka "Daytonski Sporazum" je papir koji Bosanci nikada nisu opravdavali i ne opravdavaju ni dan danas. Nekad su odlucivali trojica ljudi, ali 3 covjeka naspram kompletne Nacije nemaju sansi da uticu na buducnost Bosne vise. To je nekad bilo.

Jos za koju godinu bice ko da ih nikad nije ni bilo. Odmah da se izjasnim ne svrstavam ih sve u isti kos, ali mozemo reci da je jedan odustao od tog potpisa, ona dvojica ne bi imala sta da legalno dijele i osnivaju.

Ne bih komentarisala sta ima Srbija i Hrvatska sa Bosnom i novim Ustavom, i sta rade Hrvati, Srbi po RS i svi anti-Bosanci ali jednog dana, kad - tad, ma nicija nije do zore sjala, nasa djeca ce docekati da taj novi Ustav i Sporazum cetnicko -ustasko - anti Bosanski bude ponisten i bacen u smece, a svi neprijatelji Bosanskohercegovackog naroda i Bosanskohercegovacke Nacije ce biti ruzna proslost. To kad se desi, taj dan ce biti dan kad ce Bosna biti oslobodjenja.

Ni mocna Njemacka ni Hitler koji su haman osvojili svijet, ni Aleksandar Makedonski koji je dosegao do Egipta, ni Napoleon Bonaparta, nisu uspjeli pa nece ni cetnici ni ustase kao ni svi neprijatelji Republike Bosne i Hercegovine.

Sudjenje protiv Srbije i Crne Gore pocinje 27. februara. Politicari se nisu puno potrudili da poguraju finansijski, na njih se ne smije racunati, zato bosanskohercegovacki Narod nema izbora nego da se BORI i dalje da ide naprijed. Dajte sve od sebe da pogurate ovo sudjenje jer cetnici i ustase mole Boga da radi finasijskih poteskoca Tuzba nece moci da se nastavi sa radom.




Objavio/la Bosanac_BH prije 13 godina #

In the beginning of the war "the world" was sided with the Republic of
Bosnia-Herzegovina. Why? Because the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina was a
recognized country, a member of the UN (May 22, 1992), and a victim of
aggression. Hence, Bosnia was under the protection of international law and
the UN Charter. That is why even Russia, Greece, China and some other
Serbian, either orthodox or socialist, friends had to recognize Bosnia and
had to vote for the economic sanctions against Serbia/rump Yugoslavia. USA,
UK, Russia, France, and China were not sided with Bosnia because they like
Bosnians more than Serbs, but because Serbia violated the international
law, i.e., because Serbia committed the aggression against the member of
the UN. Besides that, according to the international law, borders of a
sovereign state cannot be changed by force; country cannot be partitioned
by force; it can only be done through negotiations.

When President of the Presidency of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Alija Izetbegovic, and his Prime minister Haris Silajdjic, accepted the
negotiations with the aggressors in September and December of 1992, they
made a terrible violation of Bosnian Constitution and Bosnian interests.
Namely, the problem could have been solved either through the
implementation of the UN charter and international law or through
negotiations.

The first way was the only appropriate way for Bosnia, because Serbia was
already designated as the aggressor and Bosnia as a victim in resolutions
752 and 757 of the Security Council in 1992. Unfortunately, Izetbegovic
and Silajdjic abandoned the internat ional law and accepted the
negotiations as a method for 'solving' the Bosnian issue. This prevented
any international intervention towards protection of Bosnia. The
negotiations even prevented the lifting of the arms embargo. How can the
embargo be lifted if the "peace process" is ongoing? This argument was
handed to enemies of Bosnia as an excellent excuse for their vetoing of
lifting of the arms embargo. We are Bosnians who begged Izetbegovic and
Silajdjic not to negotiate with the perpetrators of the genocide,
Serb/Yugoslav Army and their leaders Milosevic, Karadzic, et al. In many
personal contacts and letters Bosnian patriots explained all the
catastrophic consequences of negotiations as follows:

1. The discussions with the subject "What to do with Bosnia?" will reopen
the questions that were already solved by recognition of Bosnia as a
sovereign state in the Spring of 1992.

2. If legitimate Bosnian Government accepts to negotiate with rebels it
will convert the rebels from war criminals to diplomats who represent
Bosnian Serbs. Loyal Serbian representatives in the Bosnian Government
should represent the Serbs, patriots were telling Izetbegovic.

(This is the same reason, for example, why the French government does not
accept rebel Basks or Corsicans to negotiate about French constitution.)

3. Acceptance of Karadzic and Milosevic as a negotiators about the new
Bosnian Constitution is an act deprived of any dignity, because they and
their generals committed so many crimes against Bosnians, including mass
killings and rapes.

4. The negotiations between "Bosnian Muslims" and "Bosnian Serbs" will
reformulate the internationally declared aggression, into a "civil and
religious war". As we know UN can not get involved in a civil war on one
side.

This is the second reason why the UN could not intervene on behalf of the
Bosnian side. The first one was the "ongoing peace process"

5. Knowing that the Bosnian borders can not be changed and that aggression
can not be rewarded, Serbian soldiers do not have any motivation to fight
and die in vain. However, negotiations that will give them some part of
Bosnia will only add to their moti vation; as such, "peace negotiations"
and territorial carve-up serve only as an added incentive and a 'green
light' for aggression and genocide.


In spite to those advices, Alija Izetbegovic and Haris Silajdjic chose to
negotiate - not only about the "cease fire" (which never really happened,
anyway) - but about the Constitution and destiny of Bosnia-Herzegovina
repeating: "If we don't accept negotiations then we will be guilty." This
is not true, because a victim cannot become a guilty party in a conflict,
for refusing to negotiate with the perpetrator of crimes; Bosnians should
insist that international law and UN Charter be applied in protection of
the member of the UN, country recognized by more than 90 governments
worldwide, including the U.S.A. (April 7, 1992).

Objavio/la Bosnian prije 13 godina #

Great part of that territory was lost by the Serbs during the two last
weeks of the war. Reinforcement from Serbia arrived to retake some of
these towns. But it was an army of young, inexperienced soldiers; it was
completely defeated by the experienced Bosnian Army in the battles for
Kljuc and Sanski Most. Varcar Vakuf, Sanski Most on Vrbas valley were
liberated on October 10 and 11. Bosnian Army in that moment held 53% of
territory. Serbian officials were crying: "If something is not done in 36
hours , the Serbian component in Bosnia will be destroyed!" In that moment
Izetbegovic stopped our Army and saved the Serbs. The cease fire commenced
in October 1995; that was when Serbs were already running away from other
Bosnian town Prijedor, and were ready to leave Banja Luka. Why did
Izetbegovic do it?

Objavio/la Sanela prije 13 godina #

The US Soldiers and Dayton accord in Bosnia have only one goal: to
legalize genocide as a method for terminating one UN member state!

Objavio/la Muhamed prije 13 godina #

How long these politicians will continue to fool the Bosnians ??????

Objavio/la Harris Smith prije 13 godina #

Odlican post. :-)

Objavio/la Sarajlija iz Sehera prije 13 godina #

Dejtonski je ilegalan. Ne moze se sa ratnim zlocincima dogovorati o nasoj drzavi. To je apsurd, i uvreda svom bosanskoherecgovackom narodu. tj. svim Bosancima! Da ne pominjem zrtve koje su izgubile zivot za odbranu BIH!

Objavio/la Biserka prije 13 godina #

Taj Dejtonski je legalizovao RS, cetnici jedva docekali da otmu teritoriju koju su etnicki ocistili. Sramota, taj sporazum sa ratnim zlocincima ne samo da je nelegalan vec je APSURD, i naravno uvreda za sve Bosance i Bosanke!

Objavio/la mejra bolan prije 13 godina #

POŠTOVANI PREDSJEDNIČE....


DOKTORE MNOGO SREĆE ZDRAVLJA I RAHATLUKA VAMA I VAŠOJ FAMILIJI ČESTITAMO BAJRAM ŠERIF MUBAREK OLSUN OD FAMILIJE BUKVIĆI.OD ČLANA OPĆINSKOG VIJEĆA STRANKE ZA BIH.

Objavio/la rijad_mutap@live.com prije 8 godina 11 mjeseci #

Upišite komentar:

Vaš username:

Upišite komentar:

Unesite šifru sa slike lijevo: